http://hatmandu.net/2008/07/the-author-did-it/ Le jeu est un pied Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:02:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://hatmandu.net/2008/07/the-author-did-it/comment-page-1/#comment-272 hatmandu Sun, 06 Jul 2008 08:49:52 +0000 http://awrc.info/2008/07/the-author-did-it/#comment-272 Hm, cool, that seems to make good sense! Hm, cool, that seems to make good sense!

]]> http://hatmandu.net/2008/07/the-author-did-it/comment-page-1/#comment-271 _kent Sat, 05 Jul 2008 20:13:06 +0000 http://awrc.info/2008/07/the-author-did-it/#comment-271 C - I believe he's saying that essentially, the plot should have elegant simplicity when it is revealed. Detective fiction should not pull the reveal and leaving you feeling that it's no wonder you didn't get it because what *it* was is so labyrinthine and implausible that you don't believe it happened now that you know what it is. However, since this rule was broken not only by Conan Doyle but also Agatha Christie, you've got to conclude that it's *not* a cardinal rule of detective fiction. C – I believe he’s saying that essentially, the plot should have elegant simplicity when it is revealed. Detective fiction should not pull the reveal and leaving you feeling that it’s no wonder you didn’t get it because what *it* was is so labyrinthine and implausible that you don’t believe it happened now that you know what it is. However, since this rule was broken not only by Conan Doyle but also Agatha Christie, you’ve got to conclude that it’s *not* a cardinal rule of detective fiction.

]]>