<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The narrative of illness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hatmandu.net/2009/10/the-narrative-of-illness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hatmandu.net/2009/10/the-narrative-of-illness/</link>
	<description>Le jeu est un pied</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 14:00:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rickbot</title>
		<link>http://hatmandu.net/2009/10/the-narrative-of-illness/comment-page-1/#comment-1129</link>
		<dc:creator>Rickbot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hatmandu.net/?p=1237#comment-1129</guid>
		<description>Oh absolutely, I love story arcs. I tried reading &#039;Ivanhoe&#039; recently and quickly gave up, as after fifteen pages Sir Walter was still obsessively discussing the detail of a minor character&#039;s clothing. Two paragraphs on the belt alone. Good grief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh absolutely, I love story arcs. I tried reading &#8216;Ivanhoe&#8217; recently and quickly gave up, as after fifteen pages Sir Walter was still obsessively discussing the detail of a minor character&#8217;s clothing. Two paragraphs on the belt alone. Good grief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Matt Kallisti Matt</title>
		<link>http://hatmandu.net/2009/10/the-narrative-of-illness/comment-page-1/#comment-1128</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Matt Kallisti Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hatmandu.net/?p=1237#comment-1128</guid>
		<description>qv Heller&#039;s &quot;Something Happened&quot; - 550 pages of nothing whatsoever happening except a middle-aged man&#039;s angst, until an actual life-shattering event occurs in the last couple of pages.  I love it dearly.

Arthouse films are much more willing to mill around pointing the camera at pretty things than literature, probably because they exist in a visual medium: given it takes a thousand words to tell a picture, it&#039;s harder to write about nothing than to look at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>qv Heller&#8217;s &#8220;Something Happened&#8221; &#8211; 550 pages of nothing whatsoever happening except a middle-aged man&#8217;s angst, until an actual life-shattering event occurs in the last couple of pages.  I love it dearly.</p>
<p>Arthouse films are much more willing to mill around pointing the camera at pretty things than literature, probably because they exist in a visual medium: given it takes a thousand words to tell a picture, it&#8217;s harder to write about nothing than to look at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hatmandu</title>
		<link>http://hatmandu.net/2009/10/the-narrative-of-illness/comment-page-1/#comment-1127</link>
		<dc:creator>hatmandu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hatmandu.net/?p=1237#comment-1127</guid>
		<description>Absolutely – I don’t think an arc is a necessity. I loved A Rebours by J-K Huysmans, where bugger all happens – he basically describes the character’s soft furnishings and inner maunderings for a few hundred pages. A lot of Hollywood is boilerplate nonsense. Though I do suspect stories with an arc have a comforting value of their own. That’s what I tell myself when I enjoy Dan Brown, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely – I don’t think an arc is a necessity. I loved A Rebours by J-K Huysmans, where bugger all happens – he basically describes the character’s soft furnishings and inner maunderings for a few hundred pages. A lot of Hollywood is boilerplate nonsense. Though I do suspect stories with an arc have a comforting value of their own. That’s what I tell myself when I enjoy Dan Brown, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rickbot</title>
		<link>http://hatmandu.net/2009/10/the-narrative-of-illness/comment-page-1/#comment-1126</link>
		<dc:creator>Rickbot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hatmandu.net/?p=1237#comment-1126</guid>
		<description>Must a story always have an arc? Does there need to be a purpose and a conclusion? I don&#039;t think so. An eighth, twenty-first or thirty-sixth story might be &#039;monotony&#039;, where the author showcases their writing style by detailing events of no consequence. There is still a character who still has actions, but his actions go nowhere and mean nothing.

This is possibly more common in student films than in literature, but Colson Whitehead&#039;s The Colossus of New York is a good example in print: 13 chapters describing the tediously ordinary existence of New Yorkers, moving on the basis of mundane motivations and all of it beautifully written.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must a story always have an arc? Does there need to be a purpose and a conclusion? I don&#8217;t think so. An eighth, twenty-first or thirty-sixth story might be &#8216;monotony&#8217;, where the author showcases their writing style by detailing events of no consequence. There is still a character who still has actions, but his actions go nowhere and mean nothing.</p>
<p>This is possibly more common in student films than in literature, but Colson Whitehead&#8217;s The Colossus of New York is a good example in print: 13 chapters describing the tediously ordinary existence of New Yorkers, moving on the basis of mundane motivations and all of it beautifully written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

